How I Award Stars Now #bookreviews

Originally when I first started rating books I awarded stars based on how much I enjoyed reading the book overall. However, now at 43 years of age in the era of fake news, Brexit and scandals, I freely admit I am rating books on how much (or how little) they annoy me.

A tongue-in-cheek self-reflection, as I ploughed through the list of books I read in the past couple of months, made me realise that there are very few books that don’t have parts that annoy. This should come as no surprise to anyone because life, people and all pastimes have less enjoyable moments and some downright challenging ones. However the annoyance I feel is overshadowing moments of enjoyment more so than ever before.

Maybe due to the volume of books I read I am less patient with characters and superfluous drama and therefore more prone to getting annoyed, who knows? Maybe I’m just a grumpy liberal? Maybe there’s just too many issues surrounding us all that ratchet up the annoyance meter in me a few more notches with which I am comfortable. Whatever it is it has changed what the five star review meter means to me.

This is how I currently award stars:

***** Didn’t annoy me at all or annoyed me so little I don’t recollect.

**** Annoyed me a bit but it didn’t detract from my enjoyment of the book.

*** Annoyed me enough to irritate but it might just be me who lacks the tolerance to enjoy the eccentricities in this book.

** Annoyed me without a doubt but I still finished it. What does that say about me?

* Annoyed me to an extreme and made me livid for the time and effort I spent (trying to) read it that I’ll never get back.

This is the mental checklist that I automatically default to when clicking the number of stars I give a book. Admittedly I don’t award two or one stars very often, I don’t even recall the last book I gave a single star to, but I have noticed I award three stars more frequently now than ever. The whole rating system is based on the arbitrary frame of mind of readers, maybe a better way of seeking enjoyable reads is looking at the number of people who have chosen to rate the book? Or going back to old fashioned personal recommendations? Either way I will continue rating books in this way and maybe when I’m feeling less cantankerous I will start writing my reviews again.


  1. First, unless there’s been a glitch in my inbox, I haven’t seen or heard from your blog in quite some time and was just wondering last week what had happened to you. I hope your absence doesn’t mean that you were ill, just that you were dealing with your annoyance issues; and second, I am so freaking annoyed, like EVERY DAY — because here in the U.S. just about everyone has lost their mind whereas over in the U.K., it seems like a percentage of people are still hanging on to something that looks like common sense — so I love this new rating system and I wish you well with it. And welcome back! ox

    Liked by 1 person

    1. There’s been no glitch, I took an extended break to regroup and reflect. I’ve not blogged books for six months so I’m relearning the ropes. As far as health goes my doctors tell me I’m worse but I feel good so I’m going with my own indicators. Things maybe bizarre and unusual on the global political scene but I’m full of hope my friend, so do not fret, this too shall pass, even if a lot of what you voted for is happening right now. We just need more channels of expression to let the stress out. Thank you, I look forward to flinging More book recommendations.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to ajoobacats Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s